1. The dangers of SEO myths
  2. What is an SEO Myth?
  3. When can something appear as a myth?
  4. Avoid SEO Myths
  5. 20 common SEO myths
  6. Conclusion

There is a lot of advice out there on SEO.

Some of this is helpful, but some will mislead you if followed.

The difficulty is knowing which is which.

It can be difficult to identify what advice is correct and factual and what only flares up from misquoted articles or poorly understood Google statements.

SEO myths abound.

You will hear them in the strangest places.

A customer will tell you with confidence how they are suffering from a duplicate content penalty.

Your boss will punish you for not limiting your page title to 60 characters.

Sometimes the myths are obviously wrong. In other cases, they can be harder to spot.

The dangers of SEO myths

The problem is, we just don't know exactly how the search engines work.


Read on below

Because of this, much of what we do as SEOs is trial and error and educated guesswork.

When learning about SEO, it can be difficult to test all of the claims you hear.

Then the SEO myths take hold.

Before you know it, proudly let your manager know that you plan to optimize your BERT website copy.

SEO myths can often be shattered with a pause and some thought.

How exactly could Google measure that?

Would that actually benefit the end user in any way?

With search engine optimization, there is a risk that the search engines will be seen as all powerful and because of this, wild myths are growing about how they understand and measure our websites.

What is an SEO Myth?

Before debunking some common SEO myths, let's first understand what forms they take.

Untested wisdom

Search engine optimization myths usually come in the form of wisdom that has not been tested.


Read on below

As a result, something that may not affect driving qualified organic traffic to a site is treated like it is important.

Minor factors blown out of the relationship

SEO myths could also have a small impact on organic rankings or conversions but get too much weight.

This can be a "check mark" exercise, which is cited as a critical factor in the success of SEO, or simply an activity that can result in your website only advancing when everything else is really equal to your competition.

Outdated advice

Myths can arise simply because what used to help websites rank and convert them no longer works, but is still recommended.

It could be that something worked really well in the past.

Over time, the algorithms have become smarter.

The public is more against marketing.

What used to be good advice is no longer there.

Google is misunderstood

The start of a myth is often Google itself.

Unfortunately, advice from a Google representative that is a bit obscure or simply not easy is misunderstood and runs away.

Before we know it, a new optimization service is being sold based on a funky comment joked by a Googler.

SEO myths can actually be based, or maybe they are more accurate SEO legends?

Myths born by Google tend to be that the SEO industry's interpretation of the statement has skewed the fact so that it no longer resembles useful information.

When can something appear as a myth?

Sometimes an SEO technique can be written off as a myth by others just because they have failed to perform this activity for their own website.

It's important to remember that every website has its own industry, a number of competitors, the technology that powers it, and other factors that make it unique.

Applying techniques across the board to every website and expecting them to achieve the same result is naive.


Read on below

Someone may have had no success with a technique when they tried it in their highly competitive industry.

This doesn't mean that it won't help someone succeed in a less competitive industry.

Cause & Correlation get confused

Sometimes SEO myths arise due to an inadequate association between an activity being performed and an increase in organic search performance.

If an SEO has seen any benefit from something they did, then it is natural that they advise others to try the same thing.

Unfortunately, we're not always good at separating causality and correlation.

Just because the rankings or click-through rate increased at about the same time you implemented a new tactic, it doesn't mean that it caused the increase.

There could be other factors at play.

Soon, an SEO myth emerges from an overzealous SEO who wants to share what they mistakenly think is a golden ticket.

Avoid SEO Myths

Learning to recognize SEO myths and act accordingly can save you headaches, lost revenue, and a lot of time.


Read on below


The key to not falling for SEO myths is to make sure you can test advice whenever possible.

If you've received advice that structuring your page titles in a certain way will help your pages rank better for the keywords you selected, try a page or two first.

This way you can measure whether a change is worthwhile on multiple sides before committing to it.

Is Google just testing?

Sometimes there is a big uproar in the SEO community due to changes in the way Google displays or orders search results.

These changes are often tested in the wild before being made available for further search results.

Once one or two SEOs see a big change, advice on optimization begins to spread.

Do you remember the favorites in the desktop search results?

The excitement that the SEO industry (and Google users in general) caused was enormous.


Read on below

Suddenly articles appeared about the importance of favorites in order to attract users to your search result.

There was hardly time to investigate whether favicons would have such a strong impact on the click rate.

Because Google just changed it back like that.

Before looking for the latest SEO advice spreading on Twitter due to a change from Google, see if it applies.

It could be that the advice that now seems reasonable will quickly become a myth if Google rolls back changes.

20 common SEO myths

So now we know what creates and maintains SEO myths. Let's find out the truth behind some of the most common ones.

1. The Google Sandbox

Some SEOs believe that Google will automatically suppress new websites from organic search results for a period of time before they can rank freely.

Many SEOs argue that it just doesn't.


Read on below

So who is right?

SEOs that have been around for many years give you anecdotal evidence that both supports and detracts from the idea of ​​a sandbox.

The only guidance Google has given on this seems to be in the form of tweets.

As mentioned earlier, Google's social media responses can often be misinterpreted.

Tweet about Google Sandbox Myth

Verdict: Officially? It's a myth.


Read on below

Unofficial – there seems to be a period of time when Google tries to understand and evaluate the pages of a new website.

This could mimic a sandbox.

2. Penalty for duplicate content

This is a myth that I hear a lot. The idea is that if you have content on your website that has been duplicated elsewhere on the web, Google will penalize you for it.

The key to understanding what is really going on here is to know the difference between algorithmic suppression and manual action.

A manual action that can result in web pages being removed from the Google index is taken by a Google representative.

The website owner will be notified through the Google Search Console.

Algorithmic suppression occurs when your page does not rank well because it is being captured by an algorithm's filter.

Chuck Price does an excellent job of explaining the difference between the two in this article, which lists the various manual actions that Google takes.


Read on below

If you have a copy from another website, it essentially means that you cannot beat that other site.

The search engines may find that the original host of the copy is more relevant to the search query than yours.

Since there is no benefit to having both in the search results, yours will be suppressed. This is not a punishment. This is the algorithm that does its job.

There are some content-related manual actions as described in Price's article, but copying a page or two of someone else's content won't trigger them.

However, it will potentially get you into other trouble if you do not have a legal right to use this content. This can also detract from the value your website brings to the user.

Conclusion: SEO myth

3. PPC advertising helps with ranking

This is a common myth. It's also pretty quick to debunk.

The idea is that Google will favor websites in organic search results that are spending money on pay-per-click advertising.


Read on below

That’s just wrong.

Google's algorithm for ranking organic search results is completely different from the one used to determine the placement of PPC ads.

Running a paid search engine advertising campaign through Google at the same time as doing SEO may benefit your website for other reasons, but it will not directly affect your ranking.

Conclusion: SEO myth

4. The age of the domain is a ranking factor

This claim is firmly rooted in the camp of "confusing causation and correlation".

Since a website has been around for a long time and has a good ranking, age has to be a ranking factor.

Google has debunked this myth many times.

In July 2019, John Mueller, an analyst for Google Webmaster Trends, responded to a tweet in which he pointed out that the domain age was one of the “200 ranking signals” and said: “No, domain age doesn't help "

Tweet reply domain age

The truth behind this myth is that an older website had more time to do things well.


Read on below

For example, a website that has been up and running for 10 years may have received a large number of relevant backlinks to its key pages.

A website that's been up and running for less than six months is unlikely to compete with it.

The older website seems to be ranking better, and the bottom line is that age must be the deciding factor.

Conclusion: SEO myth

5. Tabbed content affects the ranking

This idea has roots that go back a long way.

The premise is that Google doesn't attach as much importance to the content that sits behind a tab or accordion.

For example, text that cannot be displayed the first time a page is loaded.

Google didn't re-debunk this myth until March 31, 2020, but it has been a controversial idea among many SEO years.

In September 2018, Gary Illyes, webmaster trends analyst at Google, responded to a tweet thread about using tabs to display content.

His answer:


Read on below

"AFAIK, nothing has changed here, Bill: We are indexing the content, its weight is fully taken into account for the ranking, but it may not be bolded in the clippings." It is another, more technical question, how this content is displayed by the website. Indexing has limitations. "

If the content is visible in the HTML, there is no reason to believe that it will be devalued just because it will not be visible to the user when the page first loads.

This is not an example of camouflage and Google can get the content without any problems.

Unless otherwise prevents the text from being displayed by Google, it should be weighted like a copy that is not in tabs.

Would you like further explanations on this?

Then check out Roger Montti's post bringing this myth to bed.

Conclusion: SEO myth

6. Google uses Google Analytics data in rankings

This is a common fear among business owners.

They study their Google Analytics reports.


Read on below

They feel that their average national bounce rate is too high or their time on the page is too low.

They therefore fear that Google will perceive their website as inferior in quality for this reason.

They fear that because of this, they will not have a good rank.

The myth goes that Google uses the data in your Google Analytics account as part of its ranking algorithm.

It's a myth that has been around for a long time.

Gary Illyes from Google simply debunked this idea with "We use * nothing * from Google Analytics (sic) in the" Algo ".

Tweet about Google with Analytics for the ranking algorithm

If we think about it logically, it would be very difficult for the police to use Google Analytics data as a ranking factor.


Read on below

For example, the use of filters could manipulate data to create the impression that the website is working in a way that doesn't actually work.

What is a good performance anyway?

A high "Time on Page" can be good for some long-form content.

A short "time on page" could be understandable for shorter content.

Is it either right or wrong?

Google would also need to understand the complicated ways that each Google Analytics account has been configured.

Some may exclude all known bots, and some may not.

Some may be using custom dimensions and channel groupings, others may have nothing configured.

Reliable use of this data would be extremely complicated.

Look at the hundreds of thousands of websites that use other analytics programs.

How would Google treat them?

Conclusion: SEO myth

This myth is another case of "causality, not correlation".

A high statewide bounce rate may or may not indicate a quality issue.

A short time on the page can mean that your website is not engaging or that your content is easy to digest.


Read on below

These metrics can give you clues as to why you might not be ranking well. You are not the cause of this.

7. Google takes care of the domain authority

PageRank is a link analysis algorithm that Google uses to measure the importance of a website.

Google has displayed the PageRank score of a page (up to 10) in the toolbar.

In 2013, Google stopped updating the PageRank displayed in toolbars. In 2016, Google confirmed that the PageRank toolbar metric will no longer be used in the future.

In the absence of PageRank, many other third-party authority ratings have been developed.

Commonly known are:

  • Moz's Domain Authority and Page Authority Scores.
  • Majestic & # 39; s Trust Flow and Citation Flow.
  • Domain rating and URL rating from Ahrefs.

These ratings are used by some SEOs to determine the "value" of a page.

However, this calculation can never accurately reflect how a search engine rates a page.


Read on below

In general, SEOs often refer to a website's ranking performance in conjunction with their backlink profile.

This is also known as the authority of the domain.

You can see where the confusion lies.

Google officials have dismissed the notion of any Domain Authority metric they are using.

Gary Illyes re-debunks myths with "We don't really have" general domain authority ".

Tweet to confirm the myth of general domain authority

Conclusion: SEO myth


Read on below

8. Longer content is better

You will definitely have heard that longer pieces of content rank better.

More words on a page automatically rank yours more than your competitors'.

This is "wisdom" that is often shared on SEO forums with no evidence of it.

Many studies have been published over the years giving facts about the top websites such as: B. "On average, pages in the top 10 positions in the SERPs contain more than 1,450 words."

It would be fairly easy for someone to look at this information in isolation and assume that pages take about 1,500 words to rank on page 1. However, this is not what the study says.

Unfortunately, this is an example of correlation, not necessarily causality.

Just because the highest ranking pages in a given study happen to have more words than the 11th and lower ranking pages does not make the number of words a ranking factor.


Read on below

Google's John Mueller recently dispelled this myth:

Content Tweet Length Myth

Conclusion: SEO myth

9. LSI keywords help you rank

What exactly are LSI keywords?

LSI stands for "Latent Semantic Indexing".

It is a technique used in information retrieval that can be used to analyze concepts within the text and identify relationships between them.

Words have nuances that depend on their context. The word "right" has a different connotation when paired with "left" than when paired with "wrong".


Read on below

People can quickly judge concepts in text. This is more difficult for machines.

The ability of machines to understand the context and connection between entities is fundamental to their understanding of concepts.

LSI is a huge advancement in a machine's ability to understand text.

What it is not are synonyms.

Unfortunately, the SEO community has expanded the LSI area in such a way that the use of similar or thematically linked words improves the ranking of words that are not specifically mentioned in the text.

It's just not true. Google has gone way beyond LSI when it comes to understanding text, for example when it introduced BERT.

For more information on what is and is not LSI, see Clark Boyd's article

Conclusion: SEO myth

10. SEO takes 3 months

It helps us to get out of difficult conversations with our superiors or customers.

It leaves a lot of leeway if you don't get the results promised.


Read on below

"SEO takes at least 3 months to be effective."

It's fair to say that there are some changes that will take the search engine bots some time to process.

Then of course there will be some time to determine whether these changes are positive or negative. Then it may take more time to refine and optimize your work.

This does not mean that activities you do on behalf of SEO will not have an impact for three months. Day 90 of your work will not be if the ranking changes.

There's a lot more to it than that.

If you are in a market with very little competition and you are targeting niche terms, there may be changes in rankings as soon as Google rebuilds your page.

A contest period could take much longer to recognize changes in rank.

A study by Ahrefs found that of the 2 million keywords analyzed, the average age of the pages that ranked 10th on Google was 650 days. This study shows that newer pages struggle to rank high.


Read on below

However, SEO offers more than just ranking in Google's top 10.

For example, a well-positioned Google My Business listing with great reviews can pay off for a company.

Bing, Yandex, and Baidu could be easier for your brand to hit the SERPs.

A small change to a page title could improve click-through rates. That could be the same day if the search engine quickly redrawed the page.

Although it can take a long time for the first few pages to appear in Google, it is naive for us to reduce SEO success to just that.

So "SEO takes 3 months" is just not correct.

Conclusion: SEO myth

11. The bounce rate is a ranking factor

The bounce rate is the percentage of visits to your website that do not result in any interactions beyond landing on the page. It is usually measured using a website's analytics program such as Google Analytics.

Some SEOs have argued that bounce rate is a ranking factor because it is a measure of quality.


Read on below

Unfortunately, it's not a good measure of quality.

There are many reasons why a visitor can land on a web page and leave it again without further interacting with the website. They may have read all the required information on this page and left the website to call the company and make an appointment. In this case, the visitor impact gave the company a head start.

While a visitor leaving a page they landed on can be an indicator of poor quality content, it is not always the case. It would therefore not be reliable enough for a search engine to use as a measure of quality.

A "pogo stick" or a visitor who clicks on a search result and then returns to the SERPs is a more reliable indicator of the quality of the landing page. This would indicate that the content of the page did not match what the user was looking for, so they returned to the search results to find another page or search again.


Read on below

John Mueller clarified this in a Google Webmaster Hangout in July 2018 with:

“We try not to use such signals in the search. So there are many reasons why users would go back and forth, or look at different things in search results, or just stay briefly on a page and go back again. I think that's really hard to refine and say, "Well we could make this a ranking factor."

Conclusion: SEO myth

12. It's all about backlinks

Backlinks are important, and that's easy enough in the SEO community. How important it is, however, is still being debated.

Some SEOs will tell you that backlinks are one of the many tactics that affect ranking, and not the most important one. Others will tell you that this is the only real game changer.

What we do know is that the effectiveness of links has changed over time. In the wild days before Jagger, link building consisted of adding a link to your website wherever you could.


Read on below

Articles were spun in the forum's comments, and irrelevant directories were good sources of links.

It was easy to make effective links.

It's not that easy now. Google has continued to make changes to its algorithms that reward higher quality, more relevant links, and ignore or penalize "spam" links.

However, the ability of links to influence rankings is still great.

There will be some industries that are so immature in SEO that a website can rank well without investing in link building just because of the strength of their content and technical efficiency.

This is not the case in most industries.

Relevant backlinks help with ranking, of course, but they have to go hand in hand with other optimizations.

Your website must still have a relevant copy and be crawlable.

Google's John Mueller recently stated, "Links are definitely not the top SEO factor."

Link is not the main SEO factor

If you want your traffic to actually make a difference when it gets to your website, it's definitely not just about backlinks.


Read on below

Ranking is only part of converting visitors to your website. The content and ease of use of the website are extremely important to user interaction.

Conclusion: SEO myth

13. Keywords in URLs are very important

Overcrowd your urls with keywords. It will help.

Unfortunately, it's not quite that powerful.

Tweet URLs for users

John Mueller has said several times that keywords in a URL are a very low, light ranking signal.


Read on below

If you want to rewrite your URLs to include more keywords, you're probably doing more harm than good.

Redirecting URLs en masse should be done when needed as there is always a risk involved in restructuring a website.

To add keywords to a url? It's not worth it.

Conclusion: SEO myth

14. Website migrations are all about redirects

It's something that SEOs hear too often. When migrating a website, all you have to do is remember to redirect changing URLs.

If only this was true.

In fact, website migration is one of the most difficult and complicated procedures in search engine optimization.

A website that changes its layout, CMS, domain and / or content can be viewed as a website migration.

In each of these examples, there are different aspects that can affect how the search engines perceive the quality and relevance of the pages to their target keywords.

As a result, there is a lot of verification and configuration that needs to be done if the site is to maintain its rankings and organic traffic.


Read on below

Make sure the tracking is not lost. Keeping the same content targeting. Make sure that search engine bots can still access the correct pages.

All of this needs to be taken into account when a website changes significantly.

Redirecting changing URLs is a very important part of website migration. It's by no means the only thing to worry about.

Conclusion: SEO myth

15. Known websites will always outperform unknown websites

Obviously, a bigger brand has resources that smaller brands don't. As a result, more can be invested in SEO.

More exciting pieces of content can be created, resulting in a higher volume of backlinks earned. The brand name alone can give outreach attempts more credibility.

The real question is whether Google is cranking big brands algorithmically or manually based on their fame.

This one is a bit controversial.

Some people say that Google prefers big brands. Google says differently.

In 2009, Google released an algorithm update called "Vince". This update had a huge impact on how brands were treated in the SERPs.


Read on below

Brands known offline saw a surge in their rankings for broad keywords in competition.

It's not necessarily time for smaller brands to throw in the towel.

The Vince update is broadly in line with other measures taken by Google to assess authority and quality.

Big brands are often more authoritative than smaller competitors when it comes to general keywords.

However, small brands can still win.

Long-tail keyword targeting, niche product lines, and local presence can make smaller brands more relevant to a search result than established brands.

Yes, the odds are in favor of big brands, but it's not impossible to beat them.

Verdict: Not entirely truth or myth

16. Your page must have "Near Me" in it to rank well for local SEO

It is understandable that this myth is still widespread.

In the SEO industry, the focus is still on keyword search volume. Sometimes at the expense of considering user intent and understanding the search engines.

When a searcher is looking for something with "local intent," i. H. For a place or service that is relevant to a physical location, the search engines take this into account when returning results.


Read on below

Google will likely display the Google Maps results as well as the standard organic entries.

The map results are clearly centered around the location you are looking for. However, this also applies to the standard organic lists if the search query specifies local intent.

Why Are Searches Near Me Confusing?

Typical keyword research might lead to the following results:

  • Pizza Restaurant Manhattan – 110 searches per month
  • Pizza Restaurants in Manhattan – 110 searches per month
  • best pizza restaurant Manhattan – 90 searches per month
  • Best Pizza Restaurants in Manhattan – 90 searches per month
  • best pizza place in Manhattan – 90 searches per month
  • Pizza restaurants near me – 90,500 searches per month

With a search volume like this, you'd think “pizza restaurants near me” would be the right thing, right?

However, it is likely that people searching for "Pizza Restaurant Manhattan" are in the Manhattan area or planning to travel there to eat pizza.

"Pizza Restaurant Near Me" has 90,500 searches in the US. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit ist, dass die überwiegende Mehrheit dieser Suchenden nicht nach Manhattan-Pizzen sucht.

Google weiß dies und verwendet daher die Standorterkennung und liefert die Ergebnisse des Pizzarestaurants, die für den Standort des Suchenden relevant sind.


Read on below

Daher geht es beim Element "In meiner Nähe" der Suche weniger um das Schlüsselwort als vielmehr um die Absicht hinter dem Schlüsselwort. Google betrachtet dies lediglich als den Ort, an dem sich der Suchende befindet.

Müssen Sie also "in meiner Nähe" in Ihren Inhalt aufnehmen, um für diese "in meiner Nähe" -Suche zu ranken?

Nein, Sie müssen für den Ort relevant sein, an dem sich der Suchende befindet.

Fazit: SEO Mythos

17. Besserer Inhalt bedeutet besseres Ranking

Es ist in SEO-Foren und Twitter-Threads weit verbreitet. Die allgemeine Beschwerde: "Mein Konkurrent rangiert über mir, aber ich habe erstaunliche Inhalte, und ihre sind schrecklich."

Der Schrei ist ein Schrei der Empörung. Sollten die Suchmaschinen ihre Website nicht für ihren "erstaunlichen" Inhalt belohnen?

Dies ist sowohl ein Mythos als auch manchmal eine Täuschung.

Die Qualität des Inhalts ist eine subjektive Überlegung. Wenn es sich um Ihren eigenen Inhalt handelt, ist es noch schwieriger, objektiv zu sein.

In den Augen von Google ist Ihr Content für die Suchbegriffe, nach denen Sie suchen, möglicherweise nicht besser als der Ihrer Mitbewerber.


Read on below

Vielleicht treffen Sie die Suchabsicht nicht so gut wie sie.

Vielleicht haben Sie Ihre Inhalte „überoptimiert“ und ihre Qualität reduziert.

In einigen Fällen entspricht ein besserer Inhalt einem besseren Ranking. In anderen Fällen kann die technische Leistung der Website oder ihre mangelnde lokale Relevanz dazu führen, dass sie einen niedrigeren Rang einnimmt.

Inhalt ist ein Faktor innerhalb der Ranking-Algorithmen.

Fazit: SEO Mythos

18. Sie müssen jeden Tag bloggen

Dies ist ein frustrierender Mythos, da er sich außerhalb der SEO-Branche verbreitet zu haben scheint.

Google liebt häufige Inhalte. Sie sollten jeden Tag neue Inhalte hinzufügen oder vorhandene Inhalte optimieren, um „Frische“ zu erzielen.

Woher kam diese Idee?

Google hatte 2011 ein Algorithmus-Update, das frischere Ergebnisse in den SERPs belohnt.

Dies liegt daran, dass bei einigen Abfragen die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Genauigkeit umso größer ist, je frischer die Ergebnisse sind.

Wenn Sie beispielsweise 2013 in Großbritannien nach „Royal Baby“ suchen, werden Ihnen Nachrichtenartikel über Prince George zugestellt. Suchen Sie es 2015 erneut, und Sie würden Seiten über Prinzessin Charlotte sehen.


Read on below

Im Jahr 2018 würden Sie Berichte über Prince Louis an der Spitze der Google-SERPs sehen, und im Jahr 2019 würde es Baby Archie sein.

Wenn Sie 2019, kurz nach der Geburt von Archie, nach „Royal Baby“ suchen würden, wäre es wahrscheinlich nicht hilfreich, Nachrichtenartikel über Prinz George zu sehen.

In diesem Fall erkennt Google die Suchabsicht des Nutzers und entscheidet, dass das Anzeigen von Artikeln, die sich auf das neueste britische Königsbaby beziehen, besser ist als das Anzeigen eines Artikels, der aufgrund seiner Autorität möglicherweise mehr Rang wert ist.

Dieses Algorithmus-Update bedeutet nicht, dass neuere Inhalte immer älter sind als ältere Inhalte. Google entscheidet, ob die "Abfrage Frische verdient" oder nicht.

Wenn dies der Fall ist, wird das Alter des Inhalts zu einem wichtigeren Ranking-Faktor.

Dies bedeutet, dass Sie nicht unbedingt davon profitieren, wenn Sie Inhalte nur erstellen, um sicherzustellen, dass sie neuer sind als die Inhalte der Wettbewerber.

Wenn die Frage, nach der Sie suchen, keine Frische verdient, d. H. "Wer ist Prinz Williams zweites Kind?" Eine Tatsache, die sich nicht ändern wird, dann wird das Alter des Inhalts keine wesentliche Rolle in der Rangliste spielen.


Read on below

Wenn Sie jeden Tag Inhalte schreiben, die Ihrer Meinung nach Ihre Website frisch und daher rangwürdiger halten, verschwenden Sie wahrscheinlich Zeit.

Es ist besser, gut überlegte, recherchierte und nützliche Inhalte weniger häufig zu schreiben und Ihre Ressourcen dafür zu reservieren, dass diese in hohem Maße maßgeblich und gemeinsam nutzbar sind.

Fazit: SEO Mythos

19. Sie können das Kopieren einmal und dann optimieren

Der Ausdruck "SEO-optimierte" Kopie ist im Agenturland weit verbreitet.

Es wird verwendet, um den Prozess der Erstellung von Kopien zu erläutern, die für häufig gesuchte Abfragen relevant sind.

The trouble with this is that it suggests that once you have written that copy, ensured it adequately answers searchers’ queries, you can move on.

Unfortunately, over time how searchers look for content might change. The keywords they use, the type of content they want could alter.

The search engines, too may change what they feel is the most relevant answer to the query. Perhaps the intent behind the keyword is perceived differently.


Read on below

The layout of the SERPs might alter, meaning videos are being shown at the top of the search results where previously it was just web page results.

If you look at a page only once and then don’t continue to update it and evolve it with user needs, then you risk falling behind.

Verdict: SEO myth

20. There Is a Right Way to Do SEO

This one is probably a myth in many industries, but it seems prevalent in the SEO one. There is a lot of gatekeeping in SEO social media, forums, and chats.

Unfortunately, it’s not that simple.

There are some core tenants that we know about SEO.

Usually, something is stated by a search engine representative that has been dissected, tested, and ultimately declared true.

The rest is a result of personal and collective trial and error, testing, and experience.

Processes are extremely valuable within SEO business functions, but they have to evolve and be applied appropriately.


Read on below

Different websites within different industries will respond to changes in ways others would not. Altering a meta title, so it is under 60 characters long might help the click-through rate for one page, and not for another.

Ultimately, we have to hold any SEO advice we’re given lightly before deciding whether it is right for the website you are working on.

Verdict: SEO myth


Some myths have their roots in logic, and others have no sense to them.

Now you know what to do when you hear an idea that you can’t say for certain is truth or myth.

Selected image source: Paulo Bobita


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here